High-level comparison of Keyra/Ciright form factors with honest evidence boundaries.
What is company-confirmed
The technology lineage extends from the physical Cyber One Card to SIM, eSIM and iSIM implementations for hardware-verified security. Public Keyra materials discuss SIM/eSIM signals and SIM as a trust-anchor theme.
What differs
Physical integration, provisioning, operator dependency and host access paths differ by form factor. A connectivity eSIM profile is not the same thing as a Keyra security applet.
What remains editorial
Detailed key generation location, export policy, challenge formats, algorithms and key sizes are not invented here. See the hardware verification matrix for cells marked editorial_task.
Hardware-verification matrix
Cells marked editorial task remain scoped work items — not invented equivalence.
Property
card
sim
esim
isim
Execution environment
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
Security app deployment
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
Key generation
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
Key custody
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
Verification operation
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
editorial_task
Compatibility
editorial_task — do not claim universal device/carrier support
editorial_task — do not claim universal device/carrier support
editorial_task — do not claim universal device/carrier support
editorial_task — do not claim universal device/carrier support
Joseph Callahan’s 5 September 2026 company declaration states Keyra builds on more than 15 years of Ciright Cyber One Card experience and that the technology now runs on SIM, eSIM and iSIM for hardware-verified security. The approved foundation wording presents this as an extension of the physical card lineage into integrated mobile form factors.
No. A connectivity eSIM profile provisions mobile subscription credentials for network access. A Keyra security application or applet is a distinct security workload for hardware-verified operations. They may share an eSIM platform in some architectures, but connectivity alone is not Keyra security.
Company declaration: the technology now runs on SIM for hardware-verified security. Public technology messaging describes SIM as a trust-anchor theme supporting network verification and related fraud-detection narratives. Detailed applet deployment, key custody and host-access paths remain engineering documentation tasks and are not invented here.
Company declaration includes eSIM as a current form factor for hardware-verified security. Public Keyra materials reference SIM/eSIM signals with cryptography for verification use cases. A connectivity eSIM profile is not itself the security applet; eligibility and provisioning determine whether Keyra security functions are present.
Company declaration dated 5 September 2026 states the technology now runs on iSIM for hardware-verified security as part of the SIM/eSIM/iSIM set. iSIM integrates SIM functionality into a device secure processing environment. Detailed update control, key storage and verification encodings remain editorial tasks until engineering confirms them.
Consistent across form factors: the lineage goal of hardware-verified security and Ciright Cyber One heritage. Differs: physical integration, provisioning, operator dependency, host access paths, recovery mechanics and feature availability. Do not assume key material or APIs move unchanged between form factors.